![]() Digital solutions for psychiatry also have the potential to lessen some of the barriers associated with disclosing mental health difficulties in person, such as shyness and discomfort, as well as issues related to stigma and discrimination. Furthermore, the use of digital technologies could help alleviate the load on the health care system by reducing the number of in-person appointments and providing patients with subclinical or mild mental health symptoms with self-help strategies and psychoeducation. In fact, digital assessment tools have the potential to support health care professionals in the recognition of mental health symptoms and patient-specific treatment needs. In this regard, digital technologies may offer an innovative and cost-effective way to improve and develop mental health care detection and diagnosis. ![]() With increasing pressure on mental health care budgets and the overwhelming growing burden of mental health disorders globally, prevention strategies and improvements in early identification are essential. Critically, the challenges associated with identifying and treating mental health disorders are multifaceted and present with a combination of patient, provider, and system-level barriers. Despite the well-documented economic and global burdens of mental disorders and the wide range of existing evidence-based treatments, mental health conditions remain largely underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed and undertreated, even in high-income countries. Mental health disorders represent the leading cause of disability worldwide, with over a third of the world’s population being affected by a mental health condition in their lifetime. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/25382 Trial Registration: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020214724. It will identify implications for clinical practice, areas for improvement, and directions for future research. Results: The systematic review and meta-analysis commenced in November 2020, with findings expected by May 2021.Ĭonclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis will summarize the diagnostic accuracy of question- and answer-based digital assessment tools. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool, and a descriptive analysis and meta-analysis will summarize the diagnostic accuracy of the identified digital assessment tools. The two authors will then extract data into a standardized form. Any inconsistencies will be discussed and resolved. ![]() Two authors will independently screen the titles and abstracts of identified references and select studies according to the eligibility criteria. We will conduct a comprehensive systematic literature search of MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) for appropriate articles published from January 1, 2005. The focus of the systematic review is guided by the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome framework (PICO). Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) will be used. Objective: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to establish the diagnostic accuracy of question- and answer-based digital assessment tools for diagnosing a range of highly prevalent psychiatric conditions in the adult population. JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology 12 articlesĭepartment of Chemical Engineering and BiotechnologyĬambridge Centre for Neuropsychiatric ResearchĮmail: Despite the rapidly growing number of digital assessment tools for screening and diagnosing mental health disorders, little is known about their diagnostic accuracy. ![]() JMIR Biomedical Engineering 58 articles.JMIR Perioperative Medicine 61 articles.Journal of Participatory Medicine 68 articles.JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies 164 articles.JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting 221 articles.Interactive Journal of Medical Research 236 articles.JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 915 articles.Journal of Medical Internet Research 6701 articles.When pdflatex is run again, it now sees that a main.bbl file is available! So it inserts the contents of main.bbl i.e. bbl file is all that’s achieved in this step no changes are made to the output PDF. 4.1 Some notes on using \(\mathrm to format the cited entries, and writes a formatted thebibliography list into the file main.bbl.3 Bibliography: just a list of \bibitems.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |